There are no interarea routes in the routing table for network 192.168.1.0. The OSPF routing process is inactive. The link to the new area is down. The router has not established any adjacencies with other OSPF routers.
Hey men,
Hope you can assist me realize this idea. So consider a circumstance where you have got routers set up with EIGRP and have 3 various routes leading to the destination LAN - these are usually the routés in the róuting desk. The destination host is 10.1.103.101, with its entrance Ur5 being 10.1.103.5. Subnet face mask for this LAN offers not been provided. But I speculate we can assume based on the final octet's address ideals for both.101 and.5, that there are usually 3 parts in typical - so, the first 5 parts are assigned for the subnet address. That provides us the worth of the face mask as 255.255.255.248, or /29.
R1 is the resource sponsor's gateway, with paths through either L2, L3, or R4. R5 can be the destination host's entrance.
Path through R1-R4-R5:
10.1.102.0/23 90/2875412 via 10.1.14.4, Serial 1/1
Path through L1-R2-R5:
10.1.100.0/22 90/2767614 via 10.1.12.2, Serial 0/1
Path through R1-R3-R5:
10.1.64.0/18 90/2988684 via 10.1.13.3, Serial1/0
The question is certainly, which path will become selected out of thése 3 routes for packets seeing from source to destination host.
I chose path R1-R2-R5, bécause it has the least expensive metric among thé 3 routes. But the appropriate answer is definitely route Ur1-R4-R5, because it will be the most 'particular' route with the longest prefix duration.
THE Issue Is usually: What will be given preference by EIGRP? Thé LOWEST METRIC Path, or the MOST Particular ROUTE?
What will take priority?
Help!